View source for Press release on the new law in France

{{Draft}}
A draft for an international press release on the new law in [[France]]. [[Roadmap]]:
#write the first draft in english
#translate it to your language
#release it in your country
'''This text is now frozen, now major changes should be made from now on. From now there's a 36 hour period within you can make final adjustments, raise objections and get translations done.''' 
==Draft==
===English===

A law passed in France on 17th October 2007, now endangers democracy and civil freedoms in Europe. The law, which is a transposition of a European directive on immaterial monopoly rights, makes the copyright lobby gain privileges previously only granted to law enforcement agencies. With this law, the media industry will now have access, without any justification, to personal information regarding people they more or less suspect to infringe on their material. As a legal principle, this is far from the ideals that have previously governed our courts. As a legal principle, a plaintiff should not be allowed to perform the legal function of a court.

"We're quite alarmed that the French government is trying to hand out governmental powers to single industries," says Valentin Villenave, a spokesman of the French Parti Pirate. "With a history of granting power to the people in our nation, this cannot be worthy of our history! The current regime has deliberately tried to enforce too many laws for both the public and the media to keep up, and foul play such as this is the result."

Apart from giving court privilege to the ALPA (Association de Lutte Contre la Piraterie Audiovisuelle), this law has a devastating effect for internet service providers. By law, they are now required to hand out privileged information about their customers.

"This law is very bothersome," says Florian Lauté, one of the founders of the Parti Pirate, "and do not expect its consequences to affect only French people! A lot of European nations are considering granting governmental powers to the media industry, which is simply not right, and France has just opened them the door. We do not sell out our courts; I'm disgusted that this is happening in Europe, in 2007."

However, there's more to it. To "solve" the "piracy" problem, which the French governement, just like the UK and a few others, tends to compare with theft or terrorism, president Sarkozy asked Denis Olivennes, CEO of the largest cultural products retailer in France (the F.N.A.C.) as a "neutral" person study the issue and give him a report! Quite a few French organizations have harshly criticized the Olivennes report, particularly the famous French Consumers Union (U.F.C.), who blames the culture ministry for its "repressive hardening and lack of lucidity"; "on the pretext of defending cultural diversity, the minister never gets tired of systematically advocating for an industry that is both too much concentrated and too less innovative", says the UFC.

One of the most interesting (and frightening) side-effects of the Olivennes report is the reapparance of the so-called "graduated sanctions" against citizens. This measure, that was initially part of the 2006 French "DADVSI" law, were condemned by two major democratic institutions: first the Conseil Constitutionnel, which simply rejected it as unconstitutional, and then the Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertés (CNIL), because of the numerous privacy and confidentiality issues it was leading right to. (The CNIL also condemned the above ALPA law -- but its recommandations strangely tend to be simply ignored these days...)

Unauthorized data filtering, legal threatening on the ISPs, spying on citizens: such is the world that is to come, should we give up our rights and freedoms to the record labels representatives. This goes way beyond the question of file-sharing or even the Internet: the whole democracy is at stake, when one tries to make us believe that only being a good consumer defines a good citizen.

All the international Pirate Parties, together, take a strong stand against these decisions which are far removed from any democratic standards. The pirates demand that the ALPA law is repealed, that the Olivennes-joke ends now, and that alternatives such as legalizing the private sharing of copyrighted works are considered. The worst thing that could happen would be for this 1984-thinking to be spread throughout the Europe Union and separate states.

===About us===
The PPI is composed of members of the various Pirate Parties around the world. It's aim is to encourage information sharing, and solidarity as well as foster international communication and friendship. Additionally, it also acts as a starting ground for potential Pirate Parties in countries currently without one. Currently, 27 countries have some sort of representation in PPI, with the number expected to grow.

For More Information please visit

*The PPI	                                http://www.pp-international.net 
*Piratenpartei Österreichs	        http://www.ppoe.or.at 
*Partido Pirata Chile	                http://www.partidopirata.cl 
*Piratenpartei Deutschland	        http://www.piratenpartei.de 
*Piratenpartij Nederland	                http://www.piratenpartij.nl 
*Partia Piratów	                        http://www.partiapiratow.org.pl 
*Partido Pirata (España)	                http://partidopirata.es 
*Piratpartiet	                        http://www.piratpartiet.se 
*Pirate Party of the United Kingdom	http://www.piratepartyuk.org 
*The Pirate Party of the United States	http://www.pirate-party.us
*Parti-Pirate Français                  http://www.partipirate.org
==Sources==
*[http://www.pcinpact.com/actu/news/39586-ALPA-olivennes-contrefacon-plainte-autosaisi.htm][French)
*[http://www.pcinpact.com/actu/news/39497-eucdinfo-DADVSI-lutte-contre-la-contrefacon-.htm] (French)
*[http://eucd.info/index.php?2007/10/16/349-loi-fourtou-au-dela-de-la-riposte-graduee-la-guerre-preventive&PHPSESSID=e4523f16fcb22035be91586987623f23] (French]
*[http://ameli.senat.fr/publication_pl/2007-2008/9.html] (French)
*[http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/WAspad/UnTexteDeJorf?numjo=ECEX0600189L]   (Journal officiel of 30 october 2007)
*[http://www.senat.fr/rap/l06-420/l06-420-syn.pdf] (Synthése of rapport n°420 de M. Béteille doing for the "commission of law", presented to senat on 26 july 2007)
*[http://ameli.senat.fr/amendements/2006-2007/226/accueil.html] (amendemant for this law)
*[http://www.pcinpact.com/d-108-1-mission_olivennes_engagement_interprofessionnel.htm]
*[http://www.quechoisir.org/Position.jsp;jsessionid=85637BE8147BA757516C0946DA0BC67A.tomcat-1?id=Ressources:Positions:9A5B6203B501FEDCC125739B002D5A9C&categorie=NoeudPClassement:5841FB0AEED2B5C9C1256F01003490F3&catcss=IMA101] (the UFC statement)